On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:19:42AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Rather obvious fix. Hence, I intent to commit it later as obvious,
> unless there are any comments.

Yeah, this is obviously correct.

Have you checked the function if we don't miss other clauses in there
(e.g. compared to the C implementation)?

> OpenMP/Fortran: Fix has_device_addr clause splitting [PR108558]
> 
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR fortran/108558
>       * trans-openmp.cc (gfc_split_omp_clauses): Handle has_device_addr.
> 
> libgomp/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR fortran/108558
>       * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/has_device_addr.f90: New test.
> 
>  gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.cc                        |  2 +
>  .../testsuite/libgomp.fortran/has_device_addr.f90  | 59 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.cc
> index 87213de0918..5283d0ce5f3 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.cc
> @@ -6205,6 +6205,8 @@ gfc_split_omp_clauses (gfc_code *code,
>           = code->ext.omp_clauses->lists[OMP_LIST_MAP];
>         clausesa[GFC_OMP_SPLIT_TARGET].lists[OMP_LIST_IS_DEVICE_PTR]
>           = code->ext.omp_clauses->lists[OMP_LIST_IS_DEVICE_PTR];
> +       clausesa[GFC_OMP_SPLIT_TARGET].lists[OMP_LIST_HAS_DEVICE_ADDR]
> +         = code->ext.omp_clauses->lists[OMP_LIST_HAS_DEVICE_ADDR];
>         clausesa[GFC_OMP_SPLIT_TARGET].device
>           = code->ext.omp_clauses->device;
>         clausesa[GFC_OMP_SPLIT_TARGET].thread_limit
> diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/has_device_addr.f90 
> b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/has_device_addr.f90
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..95cc7788f2d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/has_device_addr.f90
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
> +
> +!
> +! PR fortran/108558
> +!
> +
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target 
> has_device_addr\\(x\\) has_device_addr\\(y\\)" 2 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target data 
> map\\(tofrom:x\\) map\\(tofrom:y\\)" 2 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target data 
> use_device_addr\\(x\\) use_device_addr\\(y\\)" 1 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target update from\\(y\\)" 
> 1 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target data 
> map\\(tofrom:x\\) map\\(tofrom:y\\) use_device_addr\\(x\\) 
> use_device_addr\\(y\\)" 1 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp teams" 2 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp distribute" 2 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp parallel" 2 "original" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp for nowait" 2 "original" } }
> +
> +module m
> +contains
> +subroutine vectorAdd(x, y, N)
> +  implicit none
> +  integer :: N
> +  integer(4) :: x(N), y(N)
> +  integer :: i
> +
> +  !$omp target teams distribute parallel do has_device_addr(x, y)
> +  do i = 1, N
> +    y(i) = x(i) + y(i)
> +  end do
> +end subroutine vectorAdd
> +end module m
> +
> +program main
> +  use m
> +  implicit none
> +  integer, parameter :: N = 9876
> +  integer(4) :: x(N), y(N)
> +  integer :: i
> +
> +  x(:) = 1
> +  y(:) = 2
> +
> +  !$omp target data map(x, y)
> +    !$omp target data use_device_addr(x, y)
> +      call vectorAdd(x, y, N)
> +    !$omp end target data
> +    !$omp target update from(y)
> +    if (any (y /= 3)) error stop
> +  !$omp end target data
> +
> +  x = 1
> +  y = 2
> +  !$omp target data map(x, y) use_device_addr(x, y)
> +    !$omp target teams distribute parallel do has_device_addr(x, y)
> +    do i = 1, N
> +      y(i) = x(i) + y(i)
> +    end do
> + !$omp end target data
> + if (any (y /= 3)) error stop
> +end program


        Jakub

Reply via email to