Tested cris-elf and native x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Ok to commit?
-----8< ------
For targets where the ABI mandates structure layout that has
no padding, like cris-elf, this test started failing when
introduced as an add-on to the existing 1.cc, thereby
effectively causing a regression in testsuite results.
Adding an empty structure to S0, corresponds better to the
layout of hh_mm_ss<seconds>.
PR testsuite/108632
* testsuite/std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc (size): Add empty
struct at end of S0.
---
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc
index d97a9057f472..26a4555576c8 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ size()
{
using namespace std::chrono;
- struct S0 { long long h; char m; char s; bool neg; };
+ struct S0 { long long h; char m; char s; bool neg; struct { } empty; };
static_assert(sizeof(hh_mm_ss<seconds>) == sizeof(S0));
struct S1 { long long h; char m; char s; bool neg; char ss; };
static_assert(sizeof(hh_mm_ss<duration<int, std::centi>>) == sizeof(S1));
--
2.30.2
