Hi, As the testcase shows, this pattern had an incorrect constraint leading to GCC's output getting rejected by the assembler.
This patch fixes the constraint accordingly. The test is split into two: one that can run without bf16 support from the assembler and another that checks that the output actually assembles when such support is available. Bootstrapped/regtested on aarch64-linux-gnu. OK for GCC 13? Or better to wait for next stage 1? What about backports? Thanks, Alex gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/104921 * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (aarch64_bfmlal<bt>_lane<q>v4sf): Use correct constraint for operand 3. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR target/104921 * gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-1.c: New test. * gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-2.c: New test. * gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921.x: Include file for new tests.
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md index 7f212bf37cd..dd5eed387f2 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md @@ -9153,7 +9153,7 @@ (define_insn "aarch64_bfmlal<bt>_lane<q>v4sf" [(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "register_operand" "=w") (plus: V4SF (match_operand:V4SF 1 "register_operand" "0") (unspec:V4SF [(match_operand:V8BF 2 "register_operand" "w") - (match_operand:VBF 3 "register_operand" "w") + (match_operand:VBF 3 "register_operand" "x") (match_operand:SI 4 "const_int_operand" "n")] BF_MLA)))] "TARGET_BF16_SIMD" diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-1.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dcf6fe7d90d --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-O2 -march=armv8.2-a+bf16 -std=gnu99 -save-temps" } */ +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */ + +#include "pr104921.x" + +/* +**foo: +** mov v([0-9]|1[0-5])\.8b, v16\.8b +** bfmlalb v0\.4s, v1\.8h, v([0-9]|1[0-5])\.h\[0\] +** ret +*/ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-2.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..211fcd0aca9 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +/* { dg-do assemble } */ +/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_2a_bf16_neon } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-O2 -std=gnu99" } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_2a_bf16_neon_ok } */ + +#include "pr104921.x" diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921.x b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921.x new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1e1a6f24e22 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104921.x @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +#include <arm_neon.h> + +float32x4_t +foo(float32x4_t x, bfloat16x8_t a) +{ + register bfloat16x4_t b asm ("v16"); + asm volatile ("" : "=w"(b)); + return vbfmlalbq_lane_f32 (x, a, b, 0); +}