Register-register move instructions that can be easily seen as
unnecessary by the human eye may remain in the compiled result.
For example:
/* example */
double test(double a, double b) {
return __builtin_copysign(a, b);
}
test:
add.n a3, a3, a3
extui a5, a5, 31, 1
ssai 1
;; Be in the same BB
src a7, a5, a3 ;; Replacing the destination doesn't
;; violate any constraints of the
;; operands
;; No CALL insns in this span
;; Both A3 and A7 are irrelevant to
;; insns in this span
mov.n a3, a7 ;; An unnecessary reg-reg move
;; A7 is not used after this
ret.n
The last two instructions above, excluding the return instruction,
could be done like this:
src a3, a5, a3
This symptom often occurs when handling DI/DFmode values with SImode
instructions. This patch solves the above problem using peephole2
pattern.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/xtensa/xtensa.md: New peephole2 pattern that eliminates
the occurrence of general-purpose register used only once and for
transferring intermediate value.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_[01].c: New.
---
gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.md | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
.../gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_0.c | 23 ++++++++++
.../gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_1.c | 10 ++++
3 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_0.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_1.c
diff --git a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.md b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.md
index d3996b26cb5..4c1305c05e7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.md
+++ b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.md
@@ -3050,3 +3050,49 @@ FALLTHRU:;
operands[1] = GEN_INT (imm0);
operands[2] = GEN_INT (imm1);
})
+
+(define_peephole2
+ [(set (match_operand 0 "register_operand")
+ (match_operand 1 "register_operand"))]
+ "REG_NREGS (operands[0]) == 1 && GP_REG_P (REGNO (operands[0]))
+ && REG_NREGS (operands[1]) == 1 && GP_REG_P (REGNO (operands[1]))
+ && peep2_reg_dead_p (1, operands[1])"
+ [(const_int 0)]
+{
+ basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (curr_insn);
+ rtx_insn *head = BB_HEAD (bb), *insn;
+ rtx dest = operands[0], src = operands[1], pattern, t_dest, dest_orig;
+ for (insn = PREV_INSN (curr_insn);
+ insn && insn != head;
+ insn = PREV_INSN (insn))
+ if (CALL_P (insn))
+ break;
+ else if (INSN_P (insn))
+ {
+ if (GET_CODE (pattern = PATTERN (insn)) == SET
+ && REG_P (t_dest = SET_DEST (pattern))
+ && REG_NREGS (t_dest) == 1
+ && REGNO (t_dest) == REGNO (src))
+ {
+ dest_orig = SET_DEST (pattern);
+ SET_DEST (pattern) = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (t_dest),
+ REGNO (dest));
+ extract_insn (insn);
+ if (!constrain_operands (true, get_enabled_alternatives (insn)))
+ {
+ SET_DEST (pattern) = dest_orig;
+ goto ABORT;
+ }
+ df_insn_rescan (insn);
+ goto FALLTHRU;
+ }
+ if (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (dest, pattern)
+ || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (src, pattern)
+ || set_of (dest, insn)
+ || set_of (src, insn))
+ break;
+ }
+ABORT:
+ FAIL;
+FALLTHRU:;
+})
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_0.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_0.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5c195c357dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_0.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fpeephole2" } */
+
+/* can be processed */
+double test0(double a, double b) {
+ return __builtin_copysign(a, b);
+}
+
+/* cannot be processed: due to violate '0' constraint of the 2nd source
operand. */
+int test1(int a, int b) {
+ int c;
+ asm volatile ("" : "=a"(c) : "r"(a), "0"(b));
+ return c;
+}
+
+/* cannot be processed: due to violate '&' constraint of the destination
operand. */
+int test2(int a) {
+ int b;
+ asm volatile ("" : "=&a"(b) : "r"(a));
+ return b;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "mov\t|mov.n\t" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a13ef818827
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xtensa/elim_GP_regmove_1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fpeephole2 -mabi=windowed" } */
+
+/* cannot be processed: due to violate 'a' constraint of the destination
operand of the stack adjustment instruction. */
+void test(void) {
+ int buffer[8192];
+ asm volatile ("" : : "m"(buffer));
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "movsp" 1 } } */
--
2.30.2
