> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 00:23:36 +0100
> From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 17:02:31 +0100
> Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@axis.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 16:36:46 +0100
> >
> > > ... this is what I intend to commit later
> > > today, just keeping the added comment as brief as
> > > reasonable:
> >
> > Except I see the hook for errno magic took care of
> > gcc.dg/analyzer/flex-without-call-summaries.c so I'll add
> > that to the list of handled "FAIL"s in the commit log. Yay.
>
> But in the end it means we'll have to keep _[_]+errno{,_location} 'til
> we bump requirements or 10, 20 years or the end of the universe,
> doesn't it.
> Way fancy.
Not sure I see your point? The (other) identifiers are already there.
(And you do realize that this is in the analyzer part of gcc, right?)
brgds, H-P
