Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
PR libstdc++/108291
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (chunk_by_view::_M_find_next): Generalize
parameter types of the predicate passed to adjacent_find.
(chunk_by_view::_M_find_prev): Likewise.
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/chunk_by/1.cc (test04, test05):
New tests.
---
libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 8 ++---
.../std/ranges/adaptors/chunk_by/1.cc | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
index be71c370eb7..dc37a8afe51 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
@@ -6743,8 +6743,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
_M_find_next(iterator_t<_Vp> __current)
{
__glibcxx_assert(_M_pred.has_value());
- auto __pred = [this]<typename _Tp>(_Tp&& __x, _Tp&& __y) {
- return !bool((*_M_pred)(std::forward<_Tp>(__x),
std::forward<_Tp>(__y)));
+ auto __pred = [this]<typename _Tp, typename _Up>(_Tp&& __x, _Up&& __y) {
+ return !bool((*_M_pred)(std::forward<_Tp>(__x),
std::forward<_Up>(__y)));
};
auto __it = ranges::adjacent_find(__current, ranges::end(_M_base),
__pred);
return ranges::next(__it, 1, ranges::end(_M_base));
@@ -6754,8 +6754,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
_M_find_prev(iterator_t<_Vp> __current) requires bidirectional_range<_Vp>
{
__glibcxx_assert(_M_pred.has_value());
- auto __pred = [this]<typename _Tp>(_Tp&& __x, _Tp&& __y) {
- return !bool((*_M_pred)(std::forward<_Tp>(__y),
std::forward<_Tp>(__x)));
+ auto __pred = [this]<typename _Tp, typename _Up>(_Tp&& __x, _Up&& __y) {
+ return !bool((*_M_pred)(std::forward<_Up>(__y),
std::forward<_Tp>(__x)));
};
auto __rbegin = std::make_reverse_iterator(__current);
auto __rend = std::make_reverse_iterator(ranges::begin(_M_base));
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/chunk_by/1.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/chunk_by/1.cc
index f165c7d9a95..a8fceb105e0 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/chunk_by/1.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/chunk_by/1.cc
@@ -61,10 +61,45 @@ test03()
ranges::chunk_by_view<ranges::empty_view<int>, ranges::equal_to> r;
}
+constexpr bool
+test04()
+{
+ // PR libstdc++/108291
+ using namespace std::literals;
+ std::string_view s = "hello";
+ auto r = s | views::chunk_by(std::less{});
+ VERIFY( ranges::equal(r,
+ (std::string_view[]){"h"sv, "el"sv, "lo"sv},
+ ranges::equal) );
+ VERIFY( ranges::equal(r | views::reverse,
+ (std::string_view[]){"lo"sv, "el"sv, "h"sv},
+ ranges::equal) );
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+void
+test05()
+{
+ // PR libstdc++/109474
+ std::vector<bool> v = {true, false, true, true, false, false};
+ auto r = v | views::chunk_by(std::equal_to{});
+ VERIFY( ranges::equal(r,
+ (std::initializer_list<bool>[])
+ {{true}, {false}, {true, true}, {false, false}},
+ ranges::equal) );
+ VERIFY( ranges::equal(r | views::reverse,
+ (std::initializer_list<bool>[])
+ {{false, false}, {true, true}, {false}, {true}},
+ ranges::equal) );
+}
+
int
main()
{
static_assert(test01());
test02();
test03();
+ static_assert(test04());
+ test05();
}
--
2.40.0.335.g9857273be0