Thanks a lot for the testing, Kees. Jakub, do you have any more comment on the 6th version of the patches? Is it ready for the GCC13 commit? Or we need to delay it to GCC14?
This patch has been there waiting for approving for a while, I think that it’s a nice improvement to GCC and also help to the Kernel security. Thanks. Qing > On Apr 12, 2023, at 2:46 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:49:43PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote: >> the C front-end has been approved by Joseph. >> >> Jacub, could you please eview the middle end part of the changes of this >> patch? >> >> The major change is in tree-object-size.cc (addr_object_size). >> (To use the new TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY info). >> >> This patch is to fix >> PR101832(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832), >> and is needed for Linux Kernel security. It’s better to be put into GCC13. >> >> Thanks a lot! > > Just to confirm, I've done build testing with the Linux kernel, and this > is behaving as I'd expect. This makes my life MUCH easier -- many fewer > false positives for our bounds checking. :) > > -Kees > > -- > Kees Cook
