We know that the statement we are moving is already
have a SSA_NAME on the lhs so we don't need to
check that and can also just call reset_flow_sensitive_info
with the name we already got.

OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * tree-ssa-phiopt.cc (match_simplify_replacement):
        Simplify code that does the movement slightly.
---
 gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc
index 16acd2f1894..4ddb4d5db90 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc
@@ -1094,11 +1094,10 @@ match_simplify_replacement (basic_block cond_bb, 
basic_block middle_bb,
 
       tree name = gimple_get_lhs (stmt_to_move);
       // Mark the name to be renamed if there is one.
-      if (name && TREE_CODE (name) == SSA_NAME)
-       bitmap_set_bit (inserted_exprs, SSA_NAME_VERSION (name));
+      bitmap_set_bit (inserted_exprs, SSA_NAME_VERSION (name));
       gimple_stmt_iterator gsi1 = gsi_for_stmt (stmt_to_move);
       gsi_move_before (&gsi1, &gsi);
-      reset_flow_sensitive_info (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt_to_move));
+      reset_flow_sensitive_info (name);
     }
 
   replace_phi_edge_with_variable (cond_bb, e1, phi, result, inserted_exprs);
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to