Hi!

The following testcase ICEs on x86, foo function since my r14-22
improvement, but bar already since r13-4122.  The problem is the same,
in the if expression related_vector_mode is called and that starts with
  gcc_assert (VECTOR_MODE_P (vector_mode));
but nothing in the fneg/fadd match.pd pattern actually checks if the
VEC_PERM type has VECTOR_MODE_P (vec_mode).  In this case it has BLKmode
and so it ICEs.

The following patch makes sure we don't ICE on it.
Ok for trunk and 13.1 (it is a 13/14 Regression and I think the fix
is quite obvious and safe) if it passes bootstrap/regtest?

2023-04-21  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/109583
        * match.pd (fneg/fadd simplify): Don't call related_vector_mode
        if vec_mode is not VECTOR_MODE_P.

        * gcc.dg/pr109583.c: New test.

--- gcc/match.pd.jj     2023-04-18 11:01:38.867871375 +0200
+++ gcc/match.pd        2023-04-21 13:26:01.250166206 +0200
@@ -8103,7 +8103,8 @@ and,
        poly_uint64 wide_nunits;
        scalar_mode inner_mode = GET_MODE_INNER (vec_mode);
       }
-      (if (sel.series_p (0, 2, 0, 2)
+      (if (VECTOR_MODE_P (vec_mode)
+          && sel.series_p (0, 2, 0, 2)
           && sel.series_p (1, 2, nelts + 1, 2)
           && GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE (inner_mode).exists (&wide_elt_mode)
           && multiple_p (GET_MODE_NUNITS (vec_mode), 2, &wide_nunits)
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109583.c.jj  2023-04-21 13:28:36.462911138 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109583.c     2023-04-21 13:28:06.746342736 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/109583 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1 -Wno-psabi" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-mno-avx" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
+
+typedef float v8sf __attribute__((vector_size (8 * sizeof (float))));
+typedef int v8si __attribute__((vector_size (8 * sizeof (int))));
+
+#if __SIZEOF_INT__ == __SIZEOF_FLOAT__
+v8sf
+foo (v8sf x, v8sf y)
+{
+  v8sf a = x - y;
+  v8sf b = x + y;
+  return __builtin_shuffle (a, b, (v8si) { 0, 9, 2, 11, 4, 13, 6, 15 });
+}
+
+v8sf
+bar (v8sf x, v8sf y)
+{
+  v8sf a = x + y;
+  v8sf b = x - y;
+  return __builtin_shuffle (a, b, (v8si) { 0, 9, 2, 11, 4, 13, 6, 15 });
+}
+#endif

        Jakub

Reply via email to