Hi,

I would like to ping this for comments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611821.html

In this patch, "subreg:DI (x:SI)" is used. I' thinking that this
may be a concern, while it maybe acceptable for current code.

BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)

Jiufu Guo <guoji...@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Compare with previous version:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611513.html
> This patch remove un-needed lowpart_subreg_operand.
>
> For code:
> ```
> u64
> test_rlwinm_lowpart_mask (u32 v)
> {
>   u32 v1 = ((v << N) | (v >> (32 - N))) & 0xfffff00;
>   return (u64)v1;
> }
> ```
> We generate "rlwinm 3,3,4,4,23; rldicl 3,3,0,32" instead of "rlwinm 
> 3,3,4,4,23".
> Here the "rlwinm" cleans high32 bits already, so "rldicl" is reductant.
>
> Similarly, for the below code which is the functionality of "rlwinm".
> ```
> u64
> test_rlwinm_mask (u32 v)
> {
>   u32 v1 = ((v << N) | (v >> (32 - N)));
>   u64 v2 = (u64) v1 | ((u64) v1 << 32);
>   return v2 & 0xffffffffe0000003ULL;
> }
> ```
> We generate
> "rotlwi 3,3,4; sldi 9,3,32; add 3,9,3; rldicl 3,3,35,27; rldicl 3,3,29,0"
> instead of "rlwinm 3,3,4,30,2".
>
> This patch optimizes these two kinds of code to use just one "rlwinm" insn.
>
> Bootstrap and regtests pass on ppc64{,le}.
> Is this patch ok for trunk (or next stage1)?
>
>
> BR,
> Jeff (Jiufu)
>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>       * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (rlwinm_lowpart_mask): New define_insn.
>       (rlwinm_mask_<code>): New define_insn.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c: Reduce instruction number.
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm_3.c: New test.
>
> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md                 | 34 +++++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c |  6 +--
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm_3.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm_3.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> index 4a7812fa592..a7bf80da32e 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> @@ -4325,6 +4325,40 @@ (define_insn "*rotldi3_insert_7"
>    [(set_attr "type" "insert")
>     (set_attr "size" "64")])
>  
> +(define_insn "rlwinm_lowpart_mask"
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=r")
> +     (and:DI
> +       (subreg:DI
> +       (match_operator:SI 4 "rotate_mask_operator"
> +         [(match_operand:SI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "r")
> +          (match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand" "n")]) 0)
> +       (match_operand:DI 3 "const_int_operand" "n")))]
> +  "TARGET_POWERPC64 && (UINTVAL (operands[3]) >> 32) == 0
> +   && rs6000_is_valid_shift_mask (operands[3], operands[4], SImode)"
> +{
> +  return rs6000_insn_for_shift_mask (SImode, operands, false);
> +}
> +  [(set_attr "type" "shift")])
> +
> +(define_insn "rlwinm_mask_<code>"
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=r")
> +     (and:DI
> +       (plus_ior_xor:DI
> +      (ashift:DI
> +        (subreg:DI
> +          (match_operator:SI 4 "rotate_mask_operator"
> +            [(match_operand:SI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "r")
> +             (match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand" "n")]) 0)
> +        (const_int 32))
> +      (zero_extend:DI (match_dup 4)))
> +       (match_operand:DI 3 "const_int_operand" "n")))]
> +  "TARGET_POWERPC64
> +   && (UINTVAL (operands[3]) & 0xffffffff80000001ULL) == 
> 0xffffffff80000001ULL
> +   && rs6000_is_valid_mask (operands[3], NULL, NULL, SImode)"
> +{
> +  return rs6000_insn_for_shift_mask (SImode, operands, false);
> +}
> +  [(set_attr "type" "shift")])
>  
>  ; This handles the important case of multiple-precision shifts.  There is
>  ; no canonicalization rule for ASHIFT vs. LSHIFTRT, so two patterns.
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c
> index 4f4fca2d8ef..50ff01e1925 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c
> @@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
>  /* { dg-options "-O2" } */
>  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 6739 { target ilp32 } } 
> } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 9716 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 8164 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+blr} 3375 } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rldicl} 3081 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rldicl} 1538 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
>  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rlwinm} 3197 { target ilp32 } 
> } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rlwinm} 3093 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rlwinm} 3084 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rotlwi} 154 } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+srwi} 13 { target ilp32 } } } 
> */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+srdi} 13 { target lp64 } } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm_3.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm_3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..65dcd69ace2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm_3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -save-temps" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned long long u64;
> +typedef unsigned int u32;
> +#define NOINLE __attribute__ ((noinline))
> +#define V (0x9753)
> +
> +#define MASK 0xffffffffe0000003ULL
> +#define N 4
> +#define LMASK 0xfffff00
> +
> +u64 NOINLE
> +test_rlwinm_lowpart_mask (u32 v)
> +{
> +  u32 v1 = ((v << N) | (v >> (32 - N))) & LMASK;
> +  return (u64)v1;
> +}
> +
> +u64 NOINLE
> +test_rlwinm_mask (u32 v)
> +{
> +  u32 v1 = ((v << N) | (v >> (32 - N)));
> +  u64 v2 = (u64) v1 | ((u64) v1 << 32);
> +  return v2 & MASK;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrlwinm\M} 2 { target has_arch_ppc64 
> } } } */
> +
> +#define RLWINM_L(v, n)                                                       
>   \
> +  ((((v & 0xffffffffLL) << n) | ((v & 0xffffffffLL) >> (32 - n)))            
>   \
> +   & 0xffffffffLL)
> +#define RLWINM_MASK(v, n, m) (((RLWINM_L (v, n) << 32) | (RLWINM_L (v, n))) 
> & m)
> +
> +u64 v_low_mask = RLWINM_MASK (V, N, LMASK);
> +u64 v_mask = RLWINM_MASK (V, N, MASK);
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  u64 v = V;
> +  if (test_rlwinm_lowpart_mask (v) != v_low_mask
> +      || test_rlwinm_mask (v) != v_mask)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +
> +  return 0;
> +}

Reply via email to