From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
We have the following situation for MEM RTX objects:
* TARGET_PRINT_OPERAND expands to riscv_print_operand()
* This falls into the default case (unknown or on letter) of the outer
switch-case-block and the MEM case of the inner switch-case-block and
calls output_address() in final.cc with XEXP (op, 0) (the address)
* This calls targetm.asm_out.print_operand_address() which is
riscv_print_operand_address()
* riscv_print_operand_address() is targeting the address of a MEM RTX
* riscv_print_operand_address() calls riscv_print_operand() for the offset
and directly prints the register if the address is classified as ADDRESS_REG
* This falls into the default case (unknown or on letter) of the outer
switch-case-block and the default case of the inner switch-case-block and
calls output_addr_const().
However, since we know that offset must be a CONST_INT (which will be
followed by a '(<reg>)' string), there is no need to call
riscv_print_operand() for the offset.
Instead we can take the shortcut and use output_addr_const().
This change also brings the code in riscv_print_operand_address()
in line with the other cases, where output_addr_const() is used
to print offsets.
Tested with GCC regression test suite and SPEC intrate.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 5d2550871c7..92043236b17 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -4581,7 +4581,7 @@ riscv_print_operand_address (FILE *file, machine_mode
mode ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, rtx
switch (addr.type)
{
case ADDRESS_REG:
- riscv_print_operand (file, addr.offset, 0);
+ output_addr_const (file, riscv_strip_unspec_address (addr.offset));
fprintf (file, "(%s)", reg_names[REGNO (addr.reg)]);
return;
--
2.40.1
