> On the check for verbose==2, should that be verbose >= 2 ?
>
That's fair enough. Made the change.
Thanks,
Tamar.
> paul
>
> > On Apr 28, 2023, at 6:38 AM, Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches <gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > genmatch currently outputs commented out line directives that have no
> > effect but the compiler still has to parse only to discard.
> >
> > They are however handy when debugging genmatch output. As such this
> > moves them behind the -vv flag.
> >
> > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
> >
> > Ok for master?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tamar
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > PR bootstrap/84402
> > * genmatch.cc (output_line_directive): Only emit commented directive
> > when -vv.
> > (main): Initialize verbose.
> >
> > --- inline copy of patch --
> > diff --git a/gcc/genmatch.cc b/gcc/genmatch.cc index
> >
> 638606b2502f640e59527fc5a0b23fa3bedd0cee..6d62cdea2082d92e5ecc1
> 102c802
> > 05115a4e3040 100644
> > --- a/gcc/genmatch.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/genmatch.cc
> > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ output_line_directive (FILE *f, location_t location,
> > else
> > fprintf (f, "%s:%d", file, loc.line);
> > }
> > - else
> > + else if (verbose == 2)
> > /* Other gen programs really output line directives here, at least for
> > development it's right now more convenient to have line information
> > from the generated file. Still keep the directives as comment
> > for now @@ -5221,6 +5221,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> > return 1;
> >
> > bool gimple = true;
> > + verbose = 0;
> > char *input = argv[argc-1];
> > for (int i = 1; i < argc - 1; ++i)
> > {
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > <rb17227.patch>
