Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> writes: > Hi! > > On 2023-04-14T13:49:20+0100, Gaius Mulley via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> writes: >>> Separately, given that plain 'autoreconf' works, why have 'autogen.sh' at >>> all? >> >> If autoreconf does the same as autogen.sh then yes this can be removed > > Pushed to master branch commit bd6dbdb196da5aa5c7354e0fc7b0a146237bcf8a > "libgm2: Remove 'autogen.sh'". > > >> (or its contents replaced with a call to autoreconf perhaps?), > > I didn't see any advantage in that. > > > Grüße > Thomas
thank you! regards, Gaius
