On Jun 9, 2023, at 2:47 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 June 2023 19:18:45 CEST, Mike Stump via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> simulation ports. Maybe a 20-100x speedup? If you want to go this way I'd >> say do it in python at the bottom as it would be nice to switch over to >> python in the next 5-20 years and away from tcl. > > Yes, i guess we have all pondered this for way long enough, but it is a lot > of work still. > > The nice side effect would be that we see such hogs easier and earlier, at > least more comfortable. But well. Either way, what should we do about remote > env, if there is one? If the target supports it, send it and skip otherwise?
Testing is a large barrel of monkeys with a ton of small points, each of which is critical in some one. It is hard to talk about generalities when those details are very specific. So, to focus a conversation, which target, which host, canadian? Which part of the environment? What part is missing you want to fix? Want to unify between targets... and so on.
