On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:32 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> -template <class _OutputIterator, class _Size, class _Generator>
> - _OutputIterator
> -__brick_generate_n(_OutputIterator __first, _Size __count, _Generator
> __g, /* is_vector = */ std::true_type) noexcept
> +template <class _RandomAccessIterator, class Size, class _Generator>
>
> Missing uglification on Size.
>
> +_RandomAccessIterator
> +__brick_generate_n(_RandomAccessIterator __first, Size __count,
> _Generator __g,
> + /* is_vector = */ std::true_type) noexcept
> {
> return __unseq_backend::__simd_generate_n(__first, __count, __g);
> }
>
> -template <class _OutputIterator, class _Size, class _Generator>
> - _OutputIterator
> -__brick_generate_n(_OutputIterator __first, _Size __count, _Generator
> __g, /* is_vector = */ std::false_type) noexcept
> +template <class OutputIterator, class Size, class _Generator>
>
> Missing uglification on OutputIterator and Size.
>
> +OutputIterator
> +__brick_generate_n(OutputIterator __first, Size __count, _Generator __g,
> /* is_vector = */ std::false_type) noexcept
>
>
> -template <class _ForwardIterator1, class _ForwardIterator2, class
> _BinaryOperation>
> -_ForwardIterator2
> -__brick_adjacent_difference(_ForwardIterator1 __first, _ForwardIterator1
> __last, _ForwardIterator2 __d_first,
> - _BinaryOperation __op, /*is_vector=*/std::true_type) noexcept
> +template <class _RandomAccessIterator1, class _RandomAccessIterator2,
> class BinaryOperation>
>
> Missing uglification on BinaryOperation.
>
> +_RandomAccessIterator2
> +__brick_adjacent_difference(_RandomAccessIterator1 __first,
> _RandomAccessIterator1 __last,
> + _RandomAccessIterator2 __d_first,
> BinaryOperation __op,
> + /*is_vector=*/std::true_type) noexcept
>
>
> The above problems exist on the declaration and the definitions.
>
>
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/glue_execution_defs.h
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/glue_execution_defs.h
> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ namespace std
> {
> // Type trait
> using __pstl::execution::is_execution_policy;
> -#if _PSTL_CPP14_VARIABLE_TEMPLATES_PRESENT
> -# if __INTEL_COMPILER
> +#if defined(_PSTL_CPP14_VARIABLE_TEMPLATES_PRESENT)
> +# if defined(__INTEL_COMPILER)
> template <class T>
> constexpr bool is_execution_policy_v = is_execution_policy<T>::value;
> # else
>
> Pre-existing, but that T should be _Tp, but it only affects the Intel
> compiler branch, so meh.
>
> Please fix these and report them upstream too.
>
Ack.
>
> All the actual code changes look good.
>
> I think I'd prefer if __pattern_partial_sort_copy used
> std::uninitialized_copy instead of a loop and placement-new, but that
> doesn't need to hold this up. We could optimize some uses of
> std::conjunction and std::conditional to use our own __and_ and
> __conditional, but I'm not sure it's worth diverging from upstream to do
> that.
>
> Please fix the naming bugs noted above and push to trunk, thanks!
>
There were a handful of additional missed uglifications in -
* libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/glue_algorithm_impl.h
* libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/unseq_backend_simd.h
That are in this commit, but not in the patch as reviewed.
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
>
> +Reviewed-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
