On 8/1/23 15:07, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
+Manolis Tsamis
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 23:56, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
On 8/1/23 13:14, Vineet Gupta wrote:
I have some numbers for f-m-o v3 vs this. Attached here (vs. inline to
avoid the Thunderbird mangling the test formatting)
Thanks. Of particular importance is the leela change. My recollection
was that the f-m-o work also picked up that case. But if my memory is
faulty (always a possibility), then that shows a clear case where
Jivan's work picks up a case not handled by Manolis's work.
f-m-o originally targeted (and benefited) the leela-case. I wonder if
other optimizations/changes over the last year interfere with this and
what needs to be changed to accomodate this... looks like we need to
revisit against trunk.
Philipp.
And on the other direction we can see that deepsjeng isn't helped by
Jivan's work, but is helped by Manolis's new pass.
I'd always hoped/expected we'd have cases where one patch clearly helped
over the other. While the .25% to .37% improvements for the three most
impacted benchmarks doesn't move the needle much across the whole suite
they do add up over time.
Jeff
I took a quick look at Leela, the significant difference is from
additional insns with SP not getting propagated.
e.g.
231b6: mv a4,sp
231b8: sh2add a5,a5,a4
vs.
1e824: sh2add a5,a5,sp
There are 5 such instances which more or less make up for the delta.
-Vineet
