On Mon, 7 May 2012, Olivier Hainque wrote: > Joseph and David suggested to address this in a more general fashion, > along lines proposed in > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html > > The attached patch is a first shot in this direction. Only lightly tested > at this point, posted to get a first round of comments to validate that this > corresponds to what was suggested.
I haven't checked the details of the patch, but it does look substantially along the lines of what I think the logic should be. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
