On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:30:10AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > Do you have a suggestion for the language to address libgcc, libstdc++,
> > etc. and libiberty, libbacktrace, etc.?
>
> I'll work on this a bit and share a draft.
BTW, I think we should perhaps differentiate between production ready
libraries (e.g. libgcc, libstdc++, libgomp, libatomic, libgfortran, libquadmath,
libssp) vs. e.g. the sanitizer libraries which are meant for debugging and
I believe it is highly risky to run them in programs with extra priviledges
- e.g. I think they use getenv rather than *secure_getenv to get at various
tweaks for their behavior including where logging will happen and upstream
doesn't really care.
And not really sure what to say about lesser used language support
libraries, libada, libphobos, libgo, libgm2, ... nor what to say about
libvtv etc.
Jakub
