On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:42 PM Eric Gallager <eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote: > > PR109836 is a request to have -Wpointer-sign enabled by default. There > were points of disagreement raised in the bug report, so I figured > that maybe as a compromise, the warning could just be enabled by > -Wextra, as well (I have in fact seen some projects that enable > -Wextra but not -Wall). This patch would implement my suggestion of > adding it to -Wextra, but it's not ready to commit yet, as it still > needs testing, documentation, and a ChangeLog entry. I'm just posting > it here as an RFC; what do people think?
Here's the link for the previous message's spot in the archives: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/620137.html Here's an updated (but still untested) version of the patch with an invoke.texi update and a ChangeLog entry: gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: * c.opt: Have -Wpointer-sign be enabled by -Wextra, too gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/invoke.texi: Document -Wpointer-sign now being enabled by -Wextra, too
patch_Wpointer-sign_Wextra.diff
Description: Binary data
