ok
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 5:44 PM Pan Li via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > From: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com> > > In some build option combination, the default value may result in > below error. This patch would like to fix it by passing a explict > argument. > > riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc:2495:24: error: invalid use of template-name \ > ‘riscv_vector::vfcvt_f’ without an argument list > > Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com> > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc: Use explicit argument. > --- > gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc > b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc > index 22640745398..18453e54b51 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc > @@ -2492,7 +2492,7 @@ static CONSTEXPR const vfcvt_x<UNSPEC_UNSIGNED_VFCVT> > vfcvt_xu_obj; > static CONSTEXPR const vfcvt_x<UNSPEC_UNSIGNED_VFCVT, HAS_FRM> > vfcvt_xu_frm_obj; > static CONSTEXPR const vfcvt_rtz_x<FIX> vfcvt_rtz_x_obj; > static CONSTEXPR const vfcvt_rtz_x<UNSIGNED_FIX> vfcvt_rtz_xu_obj; > -static CONSTEXPR const vfcvt_f vfcvt_f_obj; > +static CONSTEXPR const vfcvt_f<NO_FRM> vfcvt_f_obj; > static CONSTEXPR const vfcvt_f<HAS_FRM> vfcvt_f_frm_obj; > static CONSTEXPR const vfwcvt_x<UNSPEC_VFCVT> vfwcvt_x_obj; > static CONSTEXPR const vfwcvt_x<UNSPEC_VFCVT, HAS_FRM> vfwcvt_x_frm_obj; > -- > 2.34.1 >
