On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:31 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > Hi! > > Recent match.pd changes trigger ICE in build_minus_one_cst, apparently > I forgot to handle BITINT_TYPE in these (while I've handled it in > build_zero_cst). > > Will commit as obvious together with the rest of the series when the last > patches are approved.
I assume there was a testcase that will be added when _BitInt front-end support gets added. Thanks, Andrew > > 2023-09-05 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR c/102989 > * tree.cc (build_one_cst, build_minus_one_cst): Handle BITINT_TYPE > like INTEGER_TYPE. > > --- gcc/tree.cc.jj 2023-09-04 09:45:33.444059843 +0200 > +++ gcc/tree.cc 2023-09-05 08:57:31.420059962 +0200 > @@ -2546,7 +2546,7 @@ build_one_cst (tree type) > { > case INTEGER_TYPE: case ENUMERAL_TYPE: case BOOLEAN_TYPE: > case POINTER_TYPE: case REFERENCE_TYPE: > - case OFFSET_TYPE: > + case OFFSET_TYPE: case BITINT_TYPE: > return build_int_cst (type, 1); > > case REAL_TYPE: > @@ -2599,7 +2599,7 @@ build_minus_one_cst (tree type) > { > case INTEGER_TYPE: case ENUMERAL_TYPE: case BOOLEAN_TYPE: > case POINTER_TYPE: case REFERENCE_TYPE: > - case OFFSET_TYPE: > + case OFFSET_TYPE: case BITINT_TYPE: > return build_int_cst (type, -1); > > case REAL_TYPE: > > Jakub >