On 9/7/23 02:56, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Main reason was to fix an ICV value; as collateral change, I also added
documentation for some of the memory-management functions.
Comments, suggestions? If not, I will commit it soon.
I only have one nit:
+@node omp_destroy_allocator
+@subsection @code{omp_destroy_allocator} -- Destroy an allocator
+@table @asis
+@item @emph{Description}:
+Releases all resources used by a memory allocator, which must not represent
+a predefined memory allocator. Accessing memory after its allocator has been
+destroyed has unspecified behavior. Passing @code{omp_null_allocator} to the
+routine is permitted but will have no effect.
s/will have/has/
I didn't build this to see how the formatting comes out, I assume you have done
that and it is consistent with the way other functions are documented.
-Sandra
