On Thu, 7 Sep 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in PR111303:
>
> For pattern "(X + C) / N": "div (plus@3 @0 INTEGER_CST@1) INTEGER_CST@2)",
> Even if "X" has value-range and "X + C" does not overflow, "@3" may still
> be undefined. Like below example:
>
> _3 = _2 + -5;
> if (0 != 0)
> goto <bb 3>; [34.00%]
> else
> goto <bb 4>; [66.00%]
> ;; succ: 3
> ;; 4
>
> ;; basic block 3, loop depth 0
> ;; pred: 2
> _5 = _3 / 5;
> ;; succ: 4
>
> The whole pattern "(_2 + -5 ) / 5" is in "bb 3", but "bb 3" would be
> unreachable (because "if (0 != 0)" is always false).
> And "get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr3, @3)" is checked in
> "bb 3", "range_of_expr" gets an "undefined vr3". Where "@3" is "_5".
>
> So, before using "vr3", it would be safe to check "!vr3.undefined_p ()".
>
> Bootstrap & regtest pass on ppc64{,le} and x86_64.
> Is this ok for trunk?
OK, but I wonder why ->range_of_expr () doesn't return false for
undefined_p ()? While "undefined" technically means we can treat
it as nonnegative_p (or not, maybe but maybe not both), we seem to
not want to do that. So why expose it at all to ranger users
(yes, internally we in some places want to handle undefined).
Richard.
> BR,
> Jeff (Jiufu Guo)
>
> PR middle-end/111303
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * match.pd ((X - N * M) / N): Add undefined_p checking.
> (X + N * M) / N): Likewise.
> ((X + C) div_rshift N): Likewise.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/pr111303.c: New test.
>
> ---
> gcc/match.pd | 3 +++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr111303.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr111303.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> index 801edb128f9..e2583ca7960 100644
> --- a/gcc/match.pd
> +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> @@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> /* "X+(N*M)" doesn't overflow. */
> && range_op_handler (PLUS_EXPR).overflow_free_p (vr0, vr3)
> && get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr4, @4)
> + && !vr4.undefined_p ()
> /* "X+N*M" is not with opposite sign as "X". */
> && (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
> || (vr0.nonnegative_p () && vr4.nonnegative_p ())
> @@ -995,6 +996,7 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> /* "X - (N*M)" doesn't overflow. */
> && range_op_handler (MINUS_EXPR).overflow_free_p (vr0, vr3)
> && get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr4, @4)
> + && !vr4.undefined_p ()
> /* "X-N*M" is not with opposite sign as "X". */
> && (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
> || (vr0.nonnegative_p () && vr4.nonnegative_p ())
> @@ -1025,6 +1027,7 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> /* "X+C" doesn't overflow. */
> && range_op_handler (PLUS_EXPR).overflow_free_p (vr0, vr1)
> && get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr3, @3)
> + && !vr3.undefined_p ()
> /* "X+C" and "X" are not of opposite sign. */
> && (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
> || (vr0.nonnegative_p () && vr3.nonnegative_p ())
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr111303.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr111303.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..eaabe55c105
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr111303.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +/* Make sure no ICE. */
> +unsigned char a;
> +int b(int c) {
> + if (c >= 5000)
> + return c / 5;
> +}
> +void d() { b(a - 5); }
> +int main() {}
>
--
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
