Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13? -- >8 --
1. Move class NTTP object pretty printing to a more general spot in the pretty printer. 2. Print the type of an class NTTP object alongside its CONSTRUCTOR value, like dump_expr would have done. 3. Don't pretty print const VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR wrapping class NTTPs. PR c++/111471 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * cxx-pretty-print.cc (cxx_pretty_printer::expression) <case VAR_DECL>: Print the value of a class NTTP object. <case VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR>: Strip cosnt VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR wrappers for class NTTPs. (pp_cxx_template_argument_list): Don't handle the class NTTP objects here. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic19.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic19.C | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic19.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc index 909a9dc917f..7cd43151592 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc @@ -1121,6 +1121,15 @@ cxx_pretty_printer::expression (tree t) t = OVL_FIRST (t); /* FALLTHRU */ case VAR_DECL: + if (DECL_NTTP_OBJECT_P (t)) + { + /* Print the type followed by the CONSTRUCTOR value of an + NTTP object. */ + simple_type_specifier (cv_unqualified (TREE_TYPE (t))); + expression (DECL_INITIAL (t)); + break; + } + /* FALLTHRU */ case PARM_DECL: case FIELD_DECL: case CONST_DECL: @@ -1261,6 +1270,14 @@ cxx_pretty_printer::expression (tree t) pp_cxx_right_paren (this); break; + case VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR: + if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)) == TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX) + { + /* Strip const VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR wrappers for class NTTPs. */ + expression (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)); + break; + } + /* FALLTHRU */ default: c_pretty_printer::expression (t); break; @@ -1966,8 +1983,6 @@ pp_cxx_template_argument_list (cxx_pretty_printer *pp, tree t) if (TYPE_P (arg) || (TREE_CODE (arg) == TEMPLATE_DECL && TYPE_P (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (arg)))) pp->type_id (arg); - else if (VAR_P (arg) && DECL_NTTP_OBJECT_P (arg)) - pp->expression (DECL_INITIAL (arg)); else pp->expression (arg); } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic19.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic19.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..20cdb63380b --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic19.C @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +// Verify our pretty printing of class NTTP objects. +// PR c++/111471 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +struct A { bool value; }; + +template<A V> + requires (V.value) // { dg-message {'\(V\).value \[with V = A\{false\}\]'} } +void f(); + +template<A V> struct B { static constexpr auto value = V.value; }; + +template<class T> + requires T::value // { dg-message {'T::value \[with T = B<A\{false\}>\]'} } +void g(); + +int main() { + f<A{false}>(); // { dg-error "no match" } + g<B<A{false}>>(); // { dg-error "no match" } +} -- 2.42.0.216.gbda494f404