On 27 September 2023 06:43:24 CEST, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>While looking into vec.h, I've noticed we still have a workaround for
>GCC 4.1-4.3 bugs.


This is https://gcc.gnu.org/PR105656
thanks,

>As we now use C++11 and thus need to be built by GCC 4.8 or later,
>I think this is now never used.
>
>Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
>2023-09-27  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>       * system.h (BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION): Don't define.
>       * vec.h (vec_default_construct): Remove BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION
>       workaround.
>       * function.cc (assign_parm_find_data_types): Likewise.
>
>--- gcc/system.h.jj    2023-04-22 20:14:03.502203388 +0200
>+++ gcc/system.h       2023-09-26 16:41:44.384204843 +0200
>@@ -905,12 +905,6 @@ extern void fancy_abort (const char *, i
> /* Some compilers do not allow the use of unsigned char in bitfields.  */
> #define BOOL_BITFIELD unsigned int
> 
>-/* GCC older than 4.4 have broken C++ value initialization handling, see
>-   PR11309, PR30111, PR33916, PR82939 and PR84405 for more details.  */
>-#if GCC_VERSION > 0 && GCC_VERSION < 4004 && !defined(__clang__)
>-# define BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION
>-#endif
>-
> /* As the last action in this file, we poison the identifiers that
>    shouldn't be used.  Note, luckily gcc-3.0's token-based integrated
>    preprocessor won't trip on poisoned identifiers that arrive from
>--- gcc/vec.h.jj       2023-07-11 13:40:40.392430080 +0200
>+++ gcc/vec.h  2023-09-26 16:44:30.637902359 +0200
>@@ -512,21 +512,6 @@ template <typename T>
> inline void
> vec_default_construct (T *dst, unsigned n)
> {
>-#ifdef BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION
>-  /* Versions of GCC before 4.4 sometimes leave certain objects
>-     uninitialized when value initialized, though if the type has
>-     user defined default ctor, that ctor is invoked.  As a workaround
>-     perform clearing first and then the value initialization, which
>-     fixes the case when value initialization doesn't initialize due to
>-     the bugs and should initialize to all zeros, but still allows
>-     vectors for types with user defined default ctor that initializes
>-     some or all elements to non-zero.  If T has no user defined
>-     default ctor and some non-static data members have user defined
>-     default ctors that initialize to non-zero the workaround will
>-     still not work properly; in that case we just need to provide
>-     user defined default ctor.  */
>-  memset (dst, '\0', sizeof (T) * n);
>-#endif
>   for ( ; n; ++dst, --n)
>     ::new (static_cast<void*>(dst)) T ();
> }
>--- gcc/function.cc.jj 2023-07-11 13:40:38.992448821 +0200
>+++ gcc/function.cc    2023-09-26 16:44:54.865567722 +0200
>@@ -2429,15 +2429,7 @@ assign_parm_find_data_types (struct assi
> {
>   int unsignedp;
> 
>-#ifndef BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION
>   *data = assign_parm_data_one ();
>-#else
>-  /* Old versions of GCC used to miscompile the above by only initializing
>-     the members with explicit constructors and copying garbage
>-     to the other members.  */
>-  assign_parm_data_one zero_data = {};
>-  *data = zero_data;
>-#endif
> 
>   /* NAMED_ARG is a misnomer.  We really mean 'non-variadic'. */
>   if (!cfun->stdarg)
>
>       Jakub
>

Reply via email to