LGTM, will commit if nobody commit that tomorrow :p

Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>於 2023年10月4日 週三,23:04寫道:

> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:49 AM Xianmiao Qu <cooper...@linux.alibaba.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: quxm <xianmiao....@alibaba-inc.com>
> >
> > When generating CFI directives for the store-pair instruction,
> > if we add two parallel REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR expr_lists like
> >   (expr_list:REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR (set (mem/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 2
> sp)
> >     (const_int 8 [0x8])) [1  S8 A64])
> >     (reg:DI 1 ra))
> >   (expr_list:REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR (set (mem/c:DI (reg/f:DI 2 sp) [1
> S8 A64])
> >     (reg:DI 8 s0))
> > only the first expr_list will be recognized by dwarf2out_frame_debug
> > funciton. So, here we generate a SEQUENCE expression of
> REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR,
> > which includes two sub-expressions of RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P. Then the
> > dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr function will iterate through all the
> sub-expressions
> > and generate the corresponding CFI directives.
> >
> > gcc/
> >         * config/riscv/thead.cc (th_mempair_save_regs): Fix missing CFI
> >         directives for store-pair instruction.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> >         * gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c: New test.
>
> LGTM, I've also tested it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
> Tested-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
>
> Thanks!
>
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc                     | 11 +++----
> >  .../gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c        | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
> > index 507c912bc39..be0cd7c1276 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
> > @@ -366,14 +366,15 @@ th_mempair_save_regs (rtx operands[4])
> >  {
> >    rtx set1 = gen_rtx_SET (operands[0], operands[1]);
> >    rtx set2 = gen_rtx_SET (operands[2], operands[3]);
> > +  rtx dwarf = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (2));
> >    rtx insn = emit_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, gen_rtvec (2, set1,
> set2)));
> >    RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
> >
> > -  REG_NOTES (insn) = alloc_EXPR_LIST (REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR,
> > -                                     copy_rtx (set1), REG_NOTES (insn));
> > -
> > -  REG_NOTES (insn) = alloc_EXPR_LIST (REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR,
> > -                                     copy_rtx (set2), REG_NOTES (insn));
> > +  XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 0) = copy_rtx (set1);
> > +  XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 1) = copy_rtx (set2);
> > +  RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 0)) = 1;
> > +  RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 1)) = 1;
> > +  add_reg_note (insn, REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR, dwarf);
> >  }
> >
> >  /* Similar like riscv_restore_reg, but restores two registers from
> memory
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..9aef4e15f8d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-O1" "-g" "-Oz" "-Os" "-flto" } }
> */
> > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_xtheadmempair -mtune=thead-c906
> -funwind-tables" { target { rv64 } } } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv32gc_xtheadmempair -mtune=thead-c906
> -funwind-tables" { target { rv32 } } } */
> > +
> > +extern void bar (void);
> > +
> > +void foo (void)
> > +{
> > +  asm volatile (";my clobber list"
> > +               : : : "s0");
> > +  bar ();
> > +  asm volatile (";my clobber list"
> > +               : : : "s0");
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.sdd\t" 1 { target { rv64 } } }
> } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".cfi_offset 8, -16" { target { rv64 } }
> } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".cfi_offset 1, -8" { target { rv64 } }
> } } */
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.swd\t" 1 { target { rv32 } } }
> } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".cfi_offset 8, -8" { target { rv32 } }
> } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".cfi_offset 1, -4" { target { rv32 } }
> } } */
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".cfi_restore 1" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".cfi_restore 8" } } */
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.ldd\t" 1 { target { rv64 } } }
> } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.lwd\t" 1 { target { rv32 } } }
> } */
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>

Reply via email to