Committed, thanks Richard.
Pan
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 8:00 PM
To: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; jeffreya...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-68.c for RVV
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> Like comment said, this test failed on 64 bytes vector.
> Both RVV and GCN has 64 bytes vector.
>
> So it's more reasonable to use vect512.
OK
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c: Use vect512.
>
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
> index e7573a14933..2dd3d8ee90c 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
> @@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ void foo ()
>
> /* We want to have the store group split into 4, 2, 4 when using 32byte
> vectors.
> Unfortunately it does not work when 64-byte vectors are available. */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail amdgcn-*-*
> } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail vect512 } }
> } */
>
--
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
