This patch is my proposed solution to PR rtl-optimization/91865. Normally RTX simplification canonicalizes a ZERO_EXTEND of a ZERO_EXTEND to a single ZERO_EXTEND, but as shown in this PR it is possible for combine's make_compound_operation to unintentionally generate a non-canonical ZERO_EXTEND of a ZERO_EXTEND, which is unlikely to be matched by the backend.
For the new test case: const int table[2] = {1, 2}; int foo (char i) { return table[i]; } compiling with -O2 -mlarge on msp430 we currently see: Trying 2 -> 7: 2: r25:HI=zero_extend(R12:QI) REG_DEAD R12:QI 7: r28:PSI=sign_extend(r25:HI)#0 REG_DEAD r25:HI Failed to match this instruction: (set (reg:PSI 28 [ iD.1772 ]) (zero_extend:PSI (zero_extend:HI (reg:QI 12 R12 [ iD.1772 ])))) which results in the following code: foo: AND #0xff, R12 RLAM.A #4, R12 { RRAM.A #4, R12 RLAM.A #1, R12 MOVX.W table(R12), R12 RETA With this patch, we now see: Trying 2 -> 7: 2: r25:HI=zero_extend(R12:QI) REG_DEAD R12:QI 7: r28:PSI=sign_extend(r25:HI)#0 REG_DEAD r25:HI Successfully matched this instruction: (set (reg:PSI 28 [ iD.1772 ]) (zero_extend:PSI (reg:QI 12 R12 [ iD.1772 ]))) allowing combination of insns 2 and 7 original costs 4 + 8 = 12 replacement cost 8 foo: MOV.B R12, R12 RLAM.A #1, R12 MOVX.W table(R12), R12 RETA This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32} with no new failures. Ok for mainline? 2023-10-14 Roger Sayle <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com> gcc/ChangeLog PR rtl-optimization/91865 * combine.cc (make_compound_operation): Avoid creating a ZERO_EXTEND of a ZERO_EXTEND. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog PR rtl-optimization/91865 * gcc.target/msp430/pr91865.c: New test case. Thanks in advance, Roger --
diff --git a/gcc/combine.cc b/gcc/combine.cc index 360aa2f25e6..f47ff596782 100644 --- a/gcc/combine.cc +++ b/gcc/combine.cc @@ -8453,6 +8453,9 @@ make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code) new_rtx, GET_MODE (XEXP (x, 0))); if (tem) return tem; + /* Avoid creating a ZERO_EXTEND of a ZERO_EXTEND. */ + if (GET_CODE (new_rtx) == ZERO_EXTEND) + new_rtx = XEXP (new_rtx, 0); SUBST (XEXP (x, 0), new_rtx); return x; } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/msp430/pr91865.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/msp430/pr91865.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8cc21c8b9e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/msp430/pr91865.c @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mlarge" } */ + +const int table[2] = {1, 2}; +int foo (char i) { return table[i]; } + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "AND" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "RRAM" } } */