On May 16, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Tom Tromey <tro...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> "Manuel" == Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> writes: > > Manuel> It seems it will never work for statement expressions: > Manuel> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/107339 > > It could be done, but it is non-trivial for sure. > > Manuel> I see how these small functions can quickly become annoying. Is it > Manuel> really that hard to make GDB ignore some functions? > > There's a new "skip" feature in gdb specifically for this. > It is in gdb 7.4. Or, you can mark them with an attribute, if you use Darwin, we've had the feature for almost a decade.
- PING PATCH: break lines in announce_function Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: PING PATCH: break lines in announce_functi... Richard Guenther
- Re: PING PATCH: break lines in announce_fu... Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: PING PATCH: break lines in announc... Richard Guenther
- Re: PING PATCH: break lines in ann... Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: PING PATCH: break lines i... Richard Guenther
- Re: PING PATCH: break lin... Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Richard Guenther
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Tom Tromey
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Mike Stump
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Mike Stump
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Tom Tromey
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Mike Stump
- Re: PING PATCH: break... Gabriel Dos Reis