Dear all,
Tobias argued in the PR that the testcase should actually be valid.
Therefore withdrawing the patch.
Sorry for expecting this to be a low-hanging fruit...
Harald
On 10/24/23 22:23, rep.dot....@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 October 2023 21:25:01 CEST, Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de> wrote:
Dear all,
the attached simple patch adds a forgotten check that an event handle
cannot be a coarray. This case appears to have been overlooked in the
original fix for this PR.
I intend to commit as obvious within 24h unless there are comments.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
index 1cc65d7fa49..08081dacde4 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
@@ -8967,6 +8967,9 @@ resolve_omp_clauses (gfc_code *code, gfc_omp_clauses
*omp_clauses,
else if (omp_clauses->detach->symtree->n.sym->attr.dimension > 0)
gfc_error ("The event handle at %L must not be an array element",
&omp_clauses->detach->where);
+ else if (omp_clauses->detach->symtree->n.sym->attr.codimension)
+ gfc_error ("The event handle at %L must not be a coarray",
ISTM that we usually do not mention "element" when talking about undue
(co)array access.
Maybe we want to streamline this specific error message?
LGTM otherwise.
Thanks for your dedication!
+ &omp_clauses->detach->where);
else if (omp_clauses->detach->symtree->n.sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED
|| omp_clauses->detach->symtree->n.sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
gfc_error ("The event handle at %L must not be part of "
