Hi,

When APX EGPR enabled, the TImode move pattern *movti_internal allows
move between gpr and sse reg using constraint pair ("r","Yd"). Then a
post-reload splitter transform such move to vec_extractv2di, while under
-msse4.1 -mno-avx EGPR is not allowed for its enabled alternative, which
caused ICE that insn does not match the constraint. To prevent such ICE,
we need to adjust the constraint correspond to "Yd". Add a new "jc"
constraint to disable EGPR under -mno-avx.

Bootstrapped and regtseted on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}.

OK for trunk?

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR target/112394
        * config/i386/constraints.md (jc): New constraint that prohibits
        EGPR on -mno-avx.
        * config/i386/i386.md (*movdi_internal): Change r constraint
        corresponds to Yd.
        (*movti_internal): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR target/112394
        * gcc.target/i386/pr112394.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/i386/constraints.md           |  3 +++
 gcc/config/i386/i386.md                  |  8 ++++----
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr112394.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr112394.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/constraints.md b/gcc/config/i386/constraints.md
index f6275740eb2..74c2f0f2d32 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/constraints.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/constraints.md
@@ -434,3 +434,6 @@ (define_address_constraint "jb"
   (and (match_operand 0 "vsib_address_operand")
        (not (and (match_test "TARGET_APX_EGPR")
                 (match_test "x86_extended_rex2reg_mentioned_p (op)")))))
+
+(define_register_constraint  "jc"
+ "TARGET_APX_EGPR && !TARGET_AVX ? GENERAL_GPR16 : GENERAL_REGS")
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index ecc74e9994e..ec39c2dd512 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -2454,8 +2454,8 @@ (define_insn "*movoi_internal_avx"
    (set_attr "mode" "OI")])
 
 (define_insn "*movti_internal"
-  [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=!r ,o ,v,v ,v ,m,?r,?Yd")
-       (match_operand:TI 1 "general_operand"      "riFo,re,C,BC,vm,v,Yd,r"))]
+  [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=!r ,o ,v,v ,v ,m,?jc,?Yd")
+       (match_operand:TI 1 "general_operand"      "riFo,re,C,BC,vm,v,Yd,jc"))]
   "(TARGET_64BIT
     && !(MEM_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1])))
    || (TARGET_SSE
@@ -2537,9 +2537,9 @@ (define_split
 
 (define_insn "*movdi_internal"
   [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
-    "=r  ,o  ,r,r  ,r,m ,*y,*y,?*y,?m,?r,?*y,?Yv,?v,?v,m ,m,?r 
,?*Yd,?r,?v,?*y,?*x,*k,*k  ,*r,*m,*k")
+    "=r  ,o  ,r,r  ,r,m ,*y,*y,?*y,?m,?r,?*y,?Yv,?v,?v,m 
,m,?jc,?*Yd,?r,?v,?*y,?*x,*k,*k  ,*r,*m,*k")
        (match_operand:DI 1 "general_operand"
-    "riFo,riF,Z,rem,i,re,C ,*y,Bk ,*y,*y,r  ,C  ,?v,Bk,?v,v,*Yd,r   ,?v,r  ,*x 
,*y ,*r,*kBk,*k,*k,CBC"))]
+    "riFo,riF,Z,rem,i,re,C ,*y,Bk ,*y,*y,r  ,C  ,?v,Bk,?v,v,*Yd,jc  ,?v,r  ,*x 
,*y ,*r,*kBk,*k,*k,CBC"))]
   "!(MEM_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1]))
    && ix86_hardreg_mov_ok (operands[0], operands[1])"
 {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr112394.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr112394.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c582f6ea6bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr112394.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* PR target/112394 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-msse4.1 -m64 -O -mapxf" } */
+
+typedef int __attribute__((__vector_size__ (8))) A;
+typedef int __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) B;
+typedef char __attribute__((__vector_size__ (4))) C;
+typedef char __attribute__((__vector_size__ (32))) D;
+typedef _Complex __int128 CU;
+typedef _Float16 __attribute__((__vector_size__ (8))) F;
+D d;
+B b;
+CU gcu;
+
+int
+foo (char c, int, int, int, int, CU cu, int x)
+{
+  d /= c | d;
+  F f = __builtin_convertvector (b, F);
+  cu /= gcu;
+  A a = (A) f;
+  int i = cu + x;
+  return ((C) a[0])[1] + i + c;
+}
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to