On 05/22/2012 12:52 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Let's see if I understand in detail the structure of the new function (beyond all the simplifications possible because the target is a scalar, etc): we want something quite similar to implicit_conversion, but at the end of it, instead of using build_user_type_conversion_1 - which returns a conversion and implies that the caller passes it to convert_like_real - something like build_user_type_conversion (maybe exactly build_user_type_conversion) Do I understand correctly?
We want to call convert_like_real on the conversion sequence in "conv" at the end of build_user_type_conversion_1: that is, the conversion sequence before the call to merge_conversion_sequences.
Jason
