* Jakub Jelinek:
> So, I guess void main (int) could be ok in some implementations, but I don't
> think that is the case of our. Florian, didn't you mean
> int
> main (void)
> or
> int
> main ()
> instead?
Exactly, it was a silly mistake.
> Note, I'm using
> int
> main ()
> {
> ...
> }
> in most tests and I hope it should be fine both in the pre-C23 way and in
> C23.
It should remain acceptable. Some people push for warnings on
int main () { … }, which is why I added the void if I was adding
the return type anyway. But it seems that warning about that
seems unlikely for GCC at least.
Thanks,
Florian
