On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 3:04 AM Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@axis.com> wrote:
>
> I added that xfail in February for { ilp32 && c++98_only } and it
> looks like it's moved on to lp64 now. :-/ Noted by Rainer
> Orth, see the PR.
>
> Tested cris-elf and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu w/wo. -m32.
> Ok to commit?
OK
> -- >8 --
> The conditions under which this this bogus warning is
> emitted has changed to not happen for 32-bit targets
> anymore. Adjust accordingly.
>
> PR testsuite/106120
> * g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C:144 XFAIL bogus warning for
> lp64 targets with c++98.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C
> index 275ecac01b5f..2024f8d93ca3 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void test_strcpy_new_int16_t (size_t n, const size_t
> vals[])
>
> int r_imin_imax = SR (INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> T (S (1), new int16_t[r_imin_imax]);
> - T (S (2), new int16_t[r_imin_imax + 1]); // { dg-bogus "into a region of
> size" "pr106120" { xfail { c++98_only } } }
> + T (S (2), new int16_t[r_imin_imax + 1]); // { dg-bogus "into a region of
> size" "pr106120" { xfail { lp64 && c++98_only } } }
> T (S (9), new int16_t[r_imin_imax * 2 + 1]);
>
> int r_0_imax = SR (0, INT_MAX);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
