On 1/10/24 06:35, Richard Biener wrote:
I think x86 maintainers could opt to disable the pass - so it would
be opt-out. It's reasonable to expect them to fix the backend given
there's nothing really wrong with the new pass, it just does
something that wasn't done before at that point?
That's been both Richard S and my experience so far -- it's exposing
latent target issues (which we're pushing forward as independent fixes)
as well as a few latent issues in various generic RTL bits (which I'll
leave to Richard S to submit). Nothing major though.
I'm a bit disappointed it's not going forward for gcc-14, but understand
and will support the decision.
Jeff
