> Yes, I'm seeing the problem using glibc. Looking at our postcommit ci > reports, it appears to only affect linux rv32gcv.
Just FYI. Double confirmed rv64gcv with glibc works well with this patch. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Edwin Lu <e...@rivosinc.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 9:45 AM To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> Cc: Patrick O'Neill <patr...@rivosinc.com> Subject: Re: [Committed V2] RISC-V: Fix regression (GCC-14 compare with GCC-13.2) of SHA256 from coremark-pro On 1/16/2024 5:41 PM, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote: > Are you saying using glibc lib ? I do the testing with newlib, I didn't > anything wrong. > Yes, I'm seeing the problem using glibc. Looking at our postcommit ci reports, it appears to only affect linux rv32gcv. > It seems that this patch triggers latent bug of VSETVL PASS (Even though > this patch doesn't change anything related to VSETVL PASS). > > I will investigate it. > > Thanks. > Thanks! Edwin
