> On Jan 17, 2024, at 19:05, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On Jan 17, 2024, at 19:02, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:39 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov >> <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >>>>>> Hi Vladimir, >>>>>> Hi Jeff, >>>>>> >>>>>> Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no >>>>>> further comments. OK to merge? >>>>> I think the question is whether or not we're too late. I know that >>>>> Richard S has held off on his late-combine pass and I'm holding off on >>>>> the ext-dce work due to the fact that we're well past stage1 close. >>>>> >>>>> I think the release managers ought to have the final say on this. >>>> >>>> I'm fine with this now, it doesn't change code generation. >>> >>> Thanks, Richard. >>> >>> I'll merge the fix for PR96388 and PR111554 -- patch 1/8. I'll commit >>> cleanups and improvements to scheduler logging -- patches 2/8 - 8/8 -- when >>> stage1 opens. >> >> This seems to have caused a compare-debug bootstrap issue on x86_64-linux, >> >> gcc/fortran/f95-lang.o differs >> >> does n_mem_deps or n_inc_deps include debug insns? > > Thanks, investigating.
Hi Richard, Yes, both n_mem_deps or n_inc_deps include debug insns, I posted a patch for this in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643267.html . Testing it now. If you prefer, I can revert the fix for PR96388 and PR111554. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org
