On Thu, 18 Jan 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > While the option was originally meant to be a Target option for a single > target, it is an option for all targets, so should be Common rather than > Target, and because it is an optimization option which could be different > in between different LTO TUs, I've added Optimization keyword too. > From what I can see, Bool is a non-documented non-existing keyword (at > least, grep Bool *.awk shows nothing, so I've dropped that too. Seems > that the option parsing simply parses and ignores any non-existing keywords. > > Guess we should drop the Bool keywords from the gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt > file eventually, so that people don't copy this around. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK > 2024-01-18 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR other/113399 > * common.opt (ffold-mem-offsets): Remove Target and Bool keywords, add > Common and Optimization. > > --- gcc/common.opt.jj 2024-01-03 11:51:31.467732078 +0100 > +++ gcc/common.opt 2024-01-17 17:22:05.975424001 +0100 > @@ -1262,7 +1262,7 @@ Common Var(flag_cprop_registers) Optimiz > Perform a register copy-propagation optimization pass. > > ffold-mem-offsets > -Target Bool Var(flag_fold_mem_offsets) Init(1) > +Common Var(flag_fold_mem_offsets) Init(1) Optimization > Fold instructions calculating memory offsets to the memory access > instruction if possible. > > fcrossjumping > > Jakub > > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
