ok. thanks,
David On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohn...@google.com> wrote: > Renamed to __gcov_dummy_ref1 and __gcov_dummy_ref2. I'd prefer that > approach for now to keep the differences with trunk to a minimum. > > Thanks, > Teresa > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, <davi...@google.com> wrote: >> Ok with better naming for the dummy function such as >> '__gcov_dummy_ref1'. Another choice is to let __gcov_flush calls >> __gcov_dump + __gcov_reset -- but the dump_completed state needs to be >> saved and restored. >> >> David >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/6276043/ > > > > -- > Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohn...@google.com | 408-460-2413
