On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 7:55 PM Nathaniel Shead
<nathanielosh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just modules.exp and dg.exp) on
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk if full regtest succeeds?
>
> (Also I noticed I forgot to add the PR to the changelog in my last
> patch, I've fixed that locally.)
>
> -- >8 --
>
> After fixing PR111710, I noticed that we currently ICE when declaring a
> type that derives from 'decltype([]{})'. As far as I can tell this
> should be legal code, since by [basic.link] p15.2 a lambda defined in a
> class-specifier should not be TU-local.
>
> This patch also adds a bunch of tests for unevaluated lambdas in other
> contexts, which generally seem to work now.

There are many unevaluated lambdas (non-modules related) bugs report
(all linked to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430).
Do you know if this fixes any of the non-module related ones too?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

>
> One interesting case is 'E::f' in the attached testcase: it appears to
> get a merge kind of 'MK_field', rather than 'MK_keyed' as most other
> lambdas do. I'm not entirely sure if this will cause issues in the
> future, but I haven't been able to construct a testcase that causes
> problems with this, and conversely wrapping the class body in
> 'start_lambda_scope' causes issues with symbol duplication in COMDAT
> groups, so I've left it as-is for now.
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
>         * module.cc (trees_out::key_mergeable): Also support TYPE_DECLs.
>         (maybe_key_decl): Likewise.
>         * parser.cc (cp_parser_class_head): Start a lambda scope when
>         parsing base classes.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_a.C:
>         * g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_b.C:
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanielosh...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  gcc/cp/module.cc                          |  8 +++++---
>  gcc/cp/parser.cc                          | 10 ++++++++--
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_a.C | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_b.C | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> index 9742bca922c..cceec79b26b 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> @@ -10784,7 +10784,8 @@ trees_out::key_mergeable (int tag, merge_kind mk, 
> tree decl, tree inner,
>                                                   (TREE_TYPE (inner)));
>             gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (scope) == VAR_DECL
>                                  || TREE_CODE (scope) == FIELD_DECL
> -                                || TREE_CODE (scope) == PARM_DECL);
> +                                || TREE_CODE (scope) == PARM_DECL
> +                                || TREE_CODE (scope) == TYPE_DECL);
>             auto *root = keyed_table->get (scope);
>             unsigned ix = root->length ();
>             /* If we don't find it, we'll write a really big number
> @@ -18980,10 +18981,11 @@ maybe_key_decl (tree ctx, tree decl)
>      return;
>
>    /* We only need to deal with lambdas attached to var, field,
> -     or parm decls.  */
> +     parm, or type decls.  */
>    if (TREE_CODE (ctx) != VAR_DECL
>        && TREE_CODE (ctx) != FIELD_DECL
> -      && TREE_CODE (ctx) != PARM_DECL)
> +      && TREE_CODE (ctx) != PARM_DECL
> +      && TREE_CODE (ctx) != TYPE_DECL)
>      return;
>
>    if (!keyed_table)
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> index 09ecfa23b5d..151e724ed66 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> @@ -27663,10 +27663,16 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser,
>    if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_COLON))
>      {
>        if (type)
> -       pushclass (type);
> +       {
> +         pushclass (type);
> +         start_lambda_scope (TYPE_NAME (type));
> +       }
>        bases = cp_parser_base_clause (parser);
>        if (type)
> -       popclass ();
> +       {
> +         finish_lambda_scope ();
> +         popclass ();
> +       }
>      }
>    else
>      bases = NULL_TREE;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_a.C 
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_a.C
> index 289285cd926..9a23827a280 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_a.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_a.C
> @@ -18,3 +18,22 @@ export struct S {
>  export inline int d(int x, int (*f)(int) = [](int x) { return x * 5; }) {
>    return f(x);
>  }
> +
> +// unevaluated lambdas
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> +export struct E : decltype([](int x) { return x * 6; }) {
> +  decltype([](int x) { return x * 7; }) f;
> +};
> +
> +export template <typename T>
> +struct G : decltype([](int x) { return x * 8; }) {
> +  decltype([](int x) { return x * 9; }) h;
> +};
> +
> +template <>
> +struct G<double> : decltype([](int x) { return x * 10; }) {
> +  decltype([](int x) { return x * 11; }) i;
> +};
> +
> +export decltype([](int x) { return x * 12; }) j;
> +#endif
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_b.C 
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_b.C
> index a8762399ee1..59a82e05cbf 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_b.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/lambda-7_b.C
> @@ -13,4 +13,27 @@ int main() {
>      __builtin_abort();
>    if (d(10) != 50)
>      __builtin_abort();
> +
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> +  E e;
> +  if (e(10) != 60)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +  if (e.f(10) != 70)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +
> +  G<int> g1;
> +  if (g1(10) != 80)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +  if (g1.h(10) != 90)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +
> +  G<double> g2;
> +  if (g2(10) != 100)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +  if (g2.i(10) != 110)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +
> +  if (j(10) != 120)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +#endif
>  }
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Reply via email to