> Believe it or not, even though I have re-worked the internals of the > lattices completely, the array itself is older than my involvement with > GCC (or at least with ipa-cp.c ;-). > > So it being an array and not a vector is historical coincidence, as far > as I am concerned :-). But that may be the reason, or because vector > macros at that time looked scary, or perhaps the initialization by > XCNEWVEC zeroing everything out was considered attractive (I kind of > like that but constructors would probably be cleaner), I don't know.
If your class is no longer a POD, then the clearing before construcion is dead and GCC may optimize it out. So fixing this may solve some surprised in foreseable future when we will try to compile older GCC's with newer ones. Honza > > Martin
