Ooops, I forgot to add --no-numbered so these were eight unrelated
patches, not PATCH 1/8 .. PATCH 8/8. Sorry for any confusion.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 14:33, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 11:49, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tested x86_64-linux. I think we should make this change, because
> > otherwise we define the typedefs for platforms with no lock-free
> > atomics, like hppa-hpux. Instead of lying, those typedefs should be
> > absent on that target.
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >
> > PR libstdc++/114103
> > * include/bits/version.def (atomic_lock_free_type_aliases): Add
> > extra_cond to check for at least one always-lock-free type.
> > * include/bits/version.h: Regenerate.
> > * include/std/atomic (atomic_signed_lock_free)
> > (atomic_unsigned_lock_free): Only use always-lock-free types.
> > ---
> > libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def | 1 +
> > libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.h | 2 +-
> > libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic | 6 +++---
> > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def
> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def
> > index 502961eb269..d298420121b 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def
> > @@ -739,6 +739,7 @@ ftms = {
> > values = {
> > v = 201907;
> > cxxmin = 20;
> > + extra_cond = "(__GCC_ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE |
> > __GCC_ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE | __GCC_ATOMIC_CHAR_LOCK_FREE) & 2";
>
> Maybe this should be > 1 instead of & 2 in case there are targets that
> define it to 4 or something. I think those are only supposed to be
> defined to 0, 1, or 2 though.
>
>
> > };
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.h
> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.h
> > index 7a6fbd35e2e..9107b45a484 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.h
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.h
> > @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@
> > #undef __glibcxx_want_atomic_float
> >
> > #if !defined(__cpp_lib_atomic_lock_free_type_aliases)
> > -# if (__cplusplus >= 202002L)
> > +# if (__cplusplus >= 202002L) && ((__GCC_ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE |
> > __GCC_ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE | __GCC_ATOMIC_CHAR_LOCK_FREE) & 2)
> > # define __glibcxx_atomic_lock_free_type_aliases 201907L
> > # if defined(__glibcxx_want_all) ||
> > defined(__glibcxx_want_atomic_lock_free_type_aliases)
> > # define __cpp_lib_atomic_lock_free_type_aliases 201907L
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic
> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic
> > index 559f8370459..1462cf5ec23 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic
> > @@ -1774,13 +1774,13 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> > = atomic<make_signed_t<__detail::__platform_wait_t>>;
> > using atomic_unsigned_lock_free
> > = atomic<make_unsigned_t<__detail::__platform_wait_t>>;
> > -# elif ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE || !(ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE ||
> > ATOMIC_CHAR_LOCK_FREE)
> > +# elif ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE == 2
>
> Similarly, this could be > 1 but again, I think == 2 is OK.
>
> > using atomic_signed_lock_free = atomic<signed int>;
> > using atomic_unsigned_lock_free = atomic<unsigned int>;
> > -# elif ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE
> > +# elif ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE == 2
> > using atomic_signed_lock_free = atomic<signed long>;
> > using atomic_unsigned_lock_free = atomic<unsigned long>;
> > -# elif ATOMIC_CHAR_LOCK_FREE
> > +# elif ATOMIC_CHAR_LOCK_FREE == 2
> > using atomic_signed_lock_free = atomic<signed char>;
> > using atomic_unsigned_lock_free = atomic<unsigned char>;
> > # else
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
