On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Rainer Orth wrote:

> Several gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-?.c tests FAIL on 32 and 64-bit
> Solaris/SPARC:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
> vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
> vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-3.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
> vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-5.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
> 
> The dumps show
> 
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c:7:30:
>  note:   ==> examining statement: _3 = *_2;
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c:7:30:
>  missed:   unsupported unaligned access
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c:8:6:
>  missed:   not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: _3 = *_2;
> 
> so I think the tests need to require vect_hw_misalign.  This is what
> this patch does.
> 
> Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11.
> 
> Ok for trunk?

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

>       Rainer
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to