On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 10:22 +0800, chenglulu wrote: > > 在 2024/4/1 上午9:29, Xi Ruoyao 写道: > > On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 09:23 +0800, chenglulu wrote: > > > > > I tested spec2006. In the floating-point program, the test items with > > > large > > > > > > fluctuations are removed, and the rest is basically unchanged. > > > > > > The fixed-point 464.h264ref (10,10) was 6.7% higher than (5,5) and > > > (10,22). > > So IIUC (10,10) is better than (5,5), (10,22), and the originally > > proposed (14,22)? Then should I make a change to make all 4 costs (SF, > > DF, SI, DI) 10? > > I think this may require the analysis of the spec's test case. I took a > look at the test results again, > > where the scores of SPEC INT 462.libquantum fluctuated greatly, but the > combination of (10,22) > > showed an overall upward trend compared to the scores of the other two > combinations. > > I don't know if (10,22) this combination happens to have the kind of > test cases in the changelog. > > So can we change it together in GCC15?
Ok. Abandoning this patch then. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
