On 5/6/24 02:32, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
In some circumstances, unions can also have an __as_base type;
Hmm, even though unions can't be bases I guess that is needed for
something like
union U {
int i;
private:
char c[5];
};
struct A {
[[no_unique_address]] U u;
char d;
};
static_assert (sizeof (A) == sizeof (U));
The patch is OK.
we need to make sure that IS_FAKE_BASE_TYPE correctly recognises this.
PR c++/114954
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-tree.h (IS_FAKE_BASE_TYPE): Also apply to unions.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/modules/pr114954.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanielosh...@gmail.com>
---
gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr114954.C | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr114954.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index 933504b4821..fa24217eb2b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -2616,7 +2616,7 @@ struct GTY(()) lang_type {
/* True iff NODE is the CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE version of some type. */
#define IS_FAKE_BASE_TYPE(NODE) \
- (TREE_CODE (NODE) == RECORD_TYPE \
+ (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (NODE) \
&& TYPE_CONTEXT (NODE) && CLASS_TYPE_P (TYPE_CONTEXT (NODE)) \
&& CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE (TYPE_CONTEXT (NODE)) == (NODE))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr114954.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr114954.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a9787140808
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr114954.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/114954
+// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules-ts" }
+// { dg-module-cmi main }
+
+export module main;
+
+template <int N>
+union U {
+private:
+ char a[N + 1];
+ int b;
+};
+
+U<4> p;