On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 19:03, Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:24:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 20/11/23 11:22 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > >--- > > > htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html | 11 +++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > > > >diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html > > >index 7278f753..b506eeb1 100644 > > >--- a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html > > >+++ b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html > > >@@ -112,6 +112,17 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> > > > </li> > > > </ul> > > > </li> > > >+ <li>C++ module scanning for named modules is now available: > > >+ <ul> > > >+ <li><a href="https://wg21.link/P1689R5";>P1689R5</a>, Format for > > >+ describing dependencies of source files. > > >+ </li> > > >+ <li>The <code>-fdeps-format=</code>, <code>-fdeps-file=</code>, and > > >+ <code>-fdeps=target=</code> flags may be used to generate P1689 > > >output > > > > This should be -fdeps-target= not -fdeps=target=. > > Whoops, yep. > > > >+ (the <code>p1689r5</code> format is the only available format > > >today). > > > > I wish the option was more descriptive than "p1689r5", which nobody is > > going to remember (but I assume we don't actually need to specify it > > explicitly since it's the only supported format). > > All users of the flag should be having it in the build system itself; > hand-coded makefiles can use it, but will need considerable `jq` > gymnastics to turn the output into properly understood make syntax > snippets for their build. > > > >+ </li> > > >+ </ul> > > > > Do we need a list for this item? It seems a bit weird that the first > > list item is just the paper How about just a single paragraph? > > > > C++ module scanning for named modules is now available, based on the > > format described in <a href="https://wg21.link/P1689R5";>P1689R5</a>, > > Format for describing dependencies of source files. The > > <code>-fdeps-format=</code>, <code>-fdeps-file=</code>, and > > <code>-fdeps-target=</code> flags may be used to generate dependency > > information. In GCC 14 <code>p1689r5</code> is the only valid argument > > for <code>-fdeps-format=</code>. > > Sounds good. New patch attached.
Thanks, Ben. I reformatted the whitespace so all the lines were under 80 columns and pushed it to wwwdocs.
