> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 11:56 AM
> To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; Richard Earnshaw
> <richard.earns...@arm.com>; Marcus Shawcroft
> <marcus.shawcr...@arm.com>; ktkac...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4]AArch64: add new tuning param and attribute for
> enabling conditional early clobber
> 
> Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> writes:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This adds a new tuning parameter EARLY_CLOBBER_SVE_PRED_DEST for AArch64
> to
> > allow us to conditionally enable the early clobber alternatives based on the
> > tuning models.
> >
> > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
> >
> > Ok for master?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tamar
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >     * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def
> >     (EARLY_CLOBBER_SVE_PRED_DEST): New.
> >     * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (TARGET_SVE_PRED_CLOBBER): New.
> >     * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (pred_clobber): New.
> >     (arch_enabled): Use it.
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def
> > index
> d5bcaebce770f0b217aac783063d39135f754c77..49fbad3ff28bc82b25c61ac50
> 1ccf533ec4b4c3f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def
> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def
> > @@ -48,4 +48,8 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION
> ("avoid_cross_loop_fma", AVOID_CROSS_LOOP_FMA)
> >
> >  AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("fully_pipelined_fma",
> FULLY_PIPELINED_FMA)
> >
> > +/* Enable is the target prefers to use a fresh register for predicate 
> > outputs
> > +   rather than re-use an input predicate register.  */
> > +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("early_clobber_sve_pred_dest",
> EARLY_CLOBBER_SVE_PRED_DEST)
> 
> Sorry for the bike-shedding, but how about something like "avoid_pred_rmw"?
> (I'm open to other suggestions.)  Just looking for something that describes
> either the architecture or the end result that we want to achieve.
> And preferable something fairly short :)
> 
> avoid_* would be consistent with the existing "avoid_cross_loop_fma".

Sure, happy to, it's something we initially struggled with naming internally as 
well.
It sounds there's precedence so the avoid_ naming, so happy to use this naming.

Will respin with it.

Thanks,
Tamar

> 
> > +
> >  #undef AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
> > index
> bbf11faaf4b4340956094a983f8b0dc2649b2d27..76a18dd511f40ebb58ed12d5
> 6b46c74084ba7c3c 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
> > @@ -495,6 +495,11 @@ constexpr auto AARCH64_FL_DEFAULT_ISA_MODE =
> AARCH64_FL_SM_OFF;
> >      enabled through +gcs.  */
> >  #define TARGET_GCS (AARCH64_ISA_GCS)
> >
> > +/*  Prefer different predicate registers for the output of a predicated 
> > operation
> over
> > +    re-using an existing input predicate.  */
> > +#define TARGET_SVE_PRED_CLOBBER (TARGET_SVE \
> > +                            && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags \
> > +                                &
> AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_EARLY_CLOBBER_SVE_PRED_DEST))
> >
> >  /* Standard register usage.  */
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> > index
> dbde066f7478bec51a8703b017ea553aa98be309..1ecd1a2812969504bd5114a
> 53473b478c5ddba82 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> > @@ -445,6 +445,10 @@ (define_enum_attr "arch" "arches" (const_string
> "any"))
> >  ;; target-independent code.
> >  (define_attr "is_call" "no,yes" (const_string "no"))
> >
> > +;; Indicates whether we want to enable the pattern with an optional early
> > +;; clobber for SVE predicates.
> > +(define_attr "pred_clobber" "no,yes" (const_string "no"))
> > +
> >  ;; [For compatibility with Arm in pipeline models]
> >  ;; Attribute that specifies whether or not the instruction touches fp
> >  ;; registers.
> > @@ -461,7 +465,8 @@ (define_attr "fp" "no,yes"
> >  (define_attr "arch_enabled" "no,yes"
> >    (if_then_else
> >      (ior
> > -   (eq_attr "arch" "any")
> > +   (and (eq_attr "arch" "any")
> > +        (eq_attr "pred_clobber" "no"))
> >
> >     (and (eq_attr "arch" "rcpc8_4")
> >          (match_test "AARCH64_ISA_RCPC8_4"))
> > @@ -488,7 +493,10 @@ (define_attr "arch_enabled" "no,yes"
> >          (match_test "TARGET_SVE"))
> >
> >     (and (eq_attr "arch" "sme")
> > -        (match_test "TARGET_SME")))
> > +        (match_test "TARGET_SME"))
> > +
> > +   (and (eq_attr "pred_clobber" "yes")
> > +        (match_test "TARGET_SVE_PRED_CLOBBER")))
> 
> IMO it'd be bettero handle pred_clobber separately from arch, as a new
> top-level AND:
> 
>   (and
>     (ior
>       (eq_attr "pred_clobber" "no")
>       (match_test "!TARGET_..."))
>     (ior
>       ...existing arch tests...))
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard

Reply via email to