On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: >> But if e.g. I use -ffixed-r9 then I think it's a reasonable expectation >> that no code is generated that touches r9 in any way, shape, or form. > > Also, I can't help but wonder if global_regs is respected.
It's clearly not. Making the added condition !fixed_regs[i] && !global_regs[i] seems sensible to me. Thanks, Roland
