On Fri, 24 May 2024 16:50:52 PDT (-0700), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/24/24 5:43 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
I'm only reading Zicclsm as saying both scalar and vector misaligned
accesses are supported, but nothing about the performance.
I think it was in the vector docs. It didn't say anything about
performance, just a note that scalar & vector behavior could differ.
Either way, the split naming scheme seems clearer to me. It also avoids
getting mixed up by the no-scalar-misaligned, yes-vector-misaligned
systems if they ever show up.
So if Robin's OK with re-spinning things, let's just go that way?
Works for me. Hopefully he's offline until Monday as it's rather late
for him :-) So we'll pick it back up in the Tuesday meeting.
Cool, no rush on my end.
jeff
