Hi, On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Regstrapped this patch (all languages+Ada) on x86_64-linux, with and > > without the above scheduler hacks, no regressions (without the > > scheduler hacks). > > The n_temp_slots_in_use part is ok. > > The rest is also a good idea, and indeed the middle-end type-based > memory-model makes sharing slots always possible (modulo bugs, like the > nonoverlapping_component_refs_p code - which should simply be removed). > > Thus, ok for the rest, too, after waiting a while for others to chime > in. Now finally in as r188667. Ciao, Michael.
